How Sale-leaseback Accounting Works With Examples .
Sale-leaseback agreements can be interesting business looking for a liquidity increase or a technique to manage their debt ratio.
However, for accountants, they can likewise be complicated to assess and identify whether a sale has happened.
So how precisely does sale-leaseback accounting work?
This post covers whatever you need to understand about these transactions, including the of sale-leaseback, advantages and disadvantages, and accounting examples.
What is a sale-leaseback?
A sale-leaseback (a.k.a. sale and leaseback) deal occurs when the owner of an asset offers it, then leases it back through a long-lasting lease. The initial owner becomes the seller-lessee, and the purchaser of the asset becomes the buyer-lessor.
While this deal doesn't impact the functional usage of the property by the seller-lessee, it does have different accounting results for both celebrations. The seller-lessee can continue utilizing the property, however legal ownership is transferred to the buyer-lessor.
Learn more about the duties of lessors and lessees.
What is the function of a sale-leaseback?
The most typical factors to enter a sale-leaseback agreement are to raise capital, enhance the balance sheet, or gain tax benefits. The seller-lessee is usually looking for to release the cash saved in the value of a residential or commercial property or property for other functions however does not wish to compromise their ability to use the possession.
Purchasers who participate in these agreements are usually institutional investors, leasing companies, or financing business pursuing a deal that has a secure return as the buyer-lessor.
Sale-leasebacks are commonly seen in markets with high-cost fixed possessions, such as building and construction, transport, property, and aerospace.
How does a sale-leaseback work?
In a sale-leaseback contract, ownership is transferred to the buyer-lessor, while the seller-lessee continues to utilize the property. For example:
- An energy business can sell the possessions that comprise their solar-power system to a financing company, then instantly lease it back to operate and satisfy the need of customers.
- Construction companies can offer their property residential or commercial properties and after that quickly rent them back from the buyer to establish them.
- Aviation companies often offer their airplane to an air travel funding organization and immediately rent them back with no pause in their regular regimen.
- Realty business frequently have sale-leaseback programs that give property owners more versatility than a conventional home sale. Equity in the home can quickly be converted into money by the seller-lessee, and mortgage brokers get to a larger customer base as the buyer-lessor. These deals are likewise referred to as "sell and stay" plans.
Advantages and disadvantages of sale-leasebacks
Sale-leaseback transactions have the versatility to be structured in numerous manner ins which can benefit both parties. Naturally, there are likewise risks associated with this kind of arrangement that both celebrations need to assess, as well as company and tax implications.
Mutual understanding of the advantages and drawbacks is an essential aspect when specifying the agreement. Let's take an appearance at the advantages and disadvantages for each party.
Pros for the seller-lessee:
- They get the alternative to expand their company or buy new devices with the influx of cash while keeping everyday access to the possession.
- It's a less costly method to get funds compared to loan financing, thus enhancing the balance sheet.
- They can invest money in other places for a higher return, therefore enhancing the profit and loss declaration (P&L).
- Sale-leaseback enables the full deductibility of lease payments with the transfer of tax ownership to the buyer-lessor.
- There's restricted risk due to property volatility.
Cons for the seller-lessee:
- The owned property is removed from the balance sheet.
- The right of usage (ROU) possession increases, depending on the lease term and agreed-upon lease payments surpassing fair-market value.
- They must recognize capital gains.
Pros for the buyer-lessor:
- Rental income over the life of the lease reinforces their financial position.
- They can ensure that lease terms are crafted to fit their requirements.
- They have more control over roi (ROI) based upon the conditions described in the contract.
- They can repossess the property if the seller-lessee defaults on payments.
Cons to the buyer-lessor:
- They must renegotiate contracts if the seller-lessee defaults on lease payments.
- They're the primary creditor/owner if the seller-lessee declare insolvency.
- There's a danger that the property worth might reduce faster than the predicted market and end up being impaired.
How to determine if a transaction qualifies as a sale-leaseback
To qualify as a sale-leaseback, a transaction needs to satisfy several requirements. When examining the agreement under ASC 842, entities need to apply ASC 606 (profits from contracts with consumers) to figure out whether the sale of a property has occurred. There is a significant amount of judgement that goes into this process, and it is good practice to have an auditor review the details and intricacies of the deal.
Let's go over the process step by step.
1. Determine if there's an agreement
First, you must determine if there is a contract as described in ASC 606-12-25-1 through 8.
Essentially, any arrangement that produces legally enforceable rights and commitments normally satisfies the definition of an agreement. Contracts can be oral, composed, or implied by an entity's popular business practices.
2. Asses if there's a sale
Assess from an accounting viewpoint if there is a sale or a funding arrangement.
The primary question is if control has actually transferred from the seller to the buyer, therefore fulfilling the performance commitment. If the answer is yes, then a sale has happened. Otherwise, the unsuccessful sale is dealt with as a financing plan.
ASC 842 referrals ASC 606-10-25-30 for a list of signs showing that control has been transferred to the buyer-lessor. The 5 control indications are:
1. The reporting entity has a present right to payment; the buyer-lessor has a present responsibility to pay the seller-lessee.
1. The consumer has a legal title.
1. The consumer has physical belongings.
1. The customer has considerable threats and benefits of ownership.
1. The client has accepted the asset.
This is where judgment will be needed to examine, generally from the buyer-lessor's position, if control has been moved. It is not needed that all the indications be met to draw this conclusion. However, it is necessary that both the seller-lessee and buyer-lessor perform this assessment individually.
It is possible that while the steps to evaluate control equal for both parties, each can concern a different conclusion that would impact the occurrence of a competent sale.
For instance, parties might make differing presumptions concerning elements such as the economic life, reasonable value of the asset, or the discount rate that would affect the lease category determination.
If the seller-lessee classifies the lease as a finance lease or the buyer-lessor categorizes the lease as a sales-type lease, then the test for control has failed. The deal needs to then follow accounting treatment for a financing transaction. Although the seller-lessee no longer legally owns the possession, they would keep it on their books. The profits would be thought about a financing liability.
Compliance for sale-leaseback deals
Accounting for sale-leasebacks is fairly unchanged by the transition from ASC 840 to ASC 842.
If a transaction was formerly accounted for as a sale-leaseback under ASC 840, it does not require to be reassessed to figure out whether it would have likewise certified as a sale (or purchase) under ASC 842. The lease part of any transaction that qualified as a sale-lease back must be accounted for by both the lessees and lessors in accordance with transition requirements.
See ASC 842-10-65-1 for assistance on delayed gain or loss balances after transition depending on the lease category.
Any deals that were accounted for as a failed sale-leaseback under ASC 840 should be reassessed under the brand-new lease requirement. Seller-lessees require to figure out if a sale would have happened either:
1. At any point on or after the start duration of the earliest period provided in the financial declaration under ASC 842 (if a reporting entity elects to adjust comparative periods).
1. At the reliable date (if a reporting entity chosen to not change comparative durations).
If a sale would have happened, the sale-leaseback needs to be accounted for according to the lease transition assistance in ASC 842-10-65-1 on a modified retrospective basis from the date a sale is identified to have happened.
Buyer-lessors, nevertheless, do not require to reassess successful purchases formerly recorded because the sale-leaseback model of ASC 840 did not use to lessors. In this situation, buyer-lessors ought to represent the leaseback in compliance with typical lessor transition assistance.
How to represent sale-leasebacks under ASC 842
If the deal fulfills the requirements under ASC 842 to qualify as a sale-leaseback, then the seller-lessee will:
- Recognize the sale and any gain or loss-the distinction in between the cash got and the book value of the property when the buy-lessor takes control of the property.
- Derecognize the property, eliminating it from the balance sheet.
- Calculate and recognize the associated lease liability and ROU property for leaseback in accordance with ASC 842.
The buyer-lessor need to also choose whether the transaction resulted in an organization mix based on ASC 805 or a property acquisition. A possession acquisition can be taped based on ASC 350: Residential Or Commercial Property, Plant & Equipment (PP&E). The valuation of the possession need to be equivalent to the fair-market value different from the leaseback contract. The contract needs to then be recognized as any other lease agreement.
To summarize, ASC 842-40-25-4 provides the following guidance on how to account for the sale-leaseback.
The seller-lessee will: - Recognize the deal cost when the buyer-lessor gets control of the possession
- Derecognize the underlying possession amount.
The buyer-lessor will: - Account for the property purchase.
- Recognize the lease in accordance with ASC 842-30.
How to change for off-market terms
Accountants should take extra steps to change for off-market terms. Per ASC 842-40-30-1, the very first action is to identify whether the prices is at reasonable value using among the following techniques, depending upon the details available:
- Comparison of the price of the asset vs. the reasonable worth of the possession.
- Comparison of the present worth of the lease payments vs. today worth of market rental payment
If there is a difference, the sale-leaseback should be gotten used to reflect the fair-market worth of the property according to ASC 842-40-30-2.
If the price is listed below reasonable value, the difference is recorded as prepaid rent. If the price of the asset is above reasonable value, the excess is thought about extra financing, different from the lease liability, received from the buyer-lessor.
To summarize, if there is a balance in between the list price and the reasonable value, the seller-lessee needs to adjust the effect of the deal:
Sale price is lower than fair worth: Make an adjustment to increase the sales price through a boost (debit) to pre-paid lease (shown in the seller-lessee's initial measurement of the ROU property).
Price is greater than reasonable worth: Make a modification to reduce the prices through a boost (credit) to additional funding liability.
Sale-leaseback accounting examples
Now that we understand the theory, let's go through a useful example of how sale-leaseback accounting works.
Suppose Blue Sky Airlines sells one of its Boeing aircrafts to ABC Aviation. Blue Sky Airlines is the seller-lessee and ABC Aviation is the buyer-lessor. Let's see what it appears like if the list price is lower than reasonable value and higher than reasonable worth.
Sale price or lease payments are lower than fair value
Let's state the seller-lessee sold the asset at a discount rate or less than market price. Thus, they should acknowledge the distinction and change for it with the right-of-use possession quantity for lease accounting.
- Asset sale quantity: $78.5 million.
- Fair-market worth: $84 million.
- Lease period: 18 years.
- Annual lease payment: $3 million.
- Rates of interest: 6%.
The ROU present value of $3 million for 18 years at 6% rates of interest is $32,482,810. The distinction in the market value and prices is $5.5 M.
Sale rate or lease payments are greater than reasonable value
Now, let's say the seller-lessee sold the possession at a premium or more than market worth.
- Asset sale amount: $86 million.
- Fair market worth: $84 million.
- Lease period: 18 years.
- Annual lease payment = $3 million.
- Rate of interest: 6%.
The ROU present value of $3 million for 18 years at 6% rate of interest is $32,482,810. The distinction in the market value and sales price is $2 million.
Blue Sky Airlines will record the following journal entries for this transaction.
Note: PP&E is taped at bring worth with the seller-lessee. Gain on the sale is the difference in the sale price ($ 86M) and the bring value ($ 80M) of the possession less the off-market change ($ 2M).
Simplify lease accounting with NetLease
As you can see, sale-leaseback deals can be time-consuming to manage, specifically if you're accounting for them by hand.
But there's a much better way. Accounting software can streamline the process, assisting you abide by lease accounting standards and handle leases perfectly.
